Macbook retina 20151/9/2024 ![]() ![]() There's a glossy overlay, but I've seen much worse offenders when it comes to screen glare and light reflection. ![]() The screen looks clear and bright, and works from wide viewing angles. (The 11-inch MacBook Air remains the only 16:9 MacBook.) The slightly unusual resolution is a combination of Apple's drive for a very high pixel-per-inch density, as well as an aspect ratio that sticks with 16:10, as opposed to nearly every other laptop available now, all of which use the same 16:9 aspect ratio as HDTV. It, too, has a new design - it's the thinnest ever built into a MacBook, at 0.88mm - with a larger aperture for light and individual pixels in red, green and blue. The new MacBook has a 12-inch Retina display with a 2,304x1,440-pixel resolution. Here's a tip: besides the tapping feature under the trackpad preferences menu, you may want to go to the accessibility menu and look under Preferences > Accessibility > Mouse & Trackpad > Trackpad options to turn on tap-to-drag. It still bewilders me that Apple turns off tap-to-click by default, forcing you to hunt around the preferences menu to find it. I ended up using this trackpad just as I do almost every other one, Apple or otherwise, by tapping rather than clicking. The most advanced use is probably fast-forwarding through a video clip in QuickTime, faster or slower, depending on how hard you press down on the trackpad. Jumping into the preview view of a document or file works with the deep click, too, just as it does now by pressing the space bar in OS X. With that second, deeper click, you can access several types of contextual information, for example, highlighting a word and getting a Wikipedia pop-up, or seeing a map when deep-clicking on an address. That deep click feels to the finger and brain like the trackpad has a stepped physical mechanism, but in fact, the movement you feel is a small horizontal shift, which, even when fully explained, still feels like you're depressing the trackpad two levels.Īpple describes it like this: "With the Force Touch trackpad, force sensors detect your click anywhere on the surface and move the trackpad laterally toward you, although the feel is the same familiar downward motion you're accustomed to in a trackpad." PT tonight, the same time as the Apple Watch, and should be available in store - presumably in limited quantities - on Friday, April 10.)įour sensors under the pad allow you to "click" anywhere on the surface, and the Force Click effect, which combines the sensors with haptic (or taptic) feedback, allows you to have two levels of perceived clicking within an app or task. (The MacBook can be ordered online at 12:00 a.m. More expensive build-to-order models are available, too. In the UK and Australia, the prices start at £1,049 and AU$1,799 for the base model and hit £1,299 and AU$2,199 for the upgrade. A second version, priced at $1,599, adds a 512GB hard drive and a tiny processor speed bump. Unlike other laptops with removable drives or RAM, everything here is (permanently) packed into a tiny custom motherboard that leaves maximum room for a large battery. ![]() Starting at $1,299, it includes a high-resolution Retina screen (much sharper than that on the Air), 8GB of RAM and 256GB of solid state storage. Instead we should look to the performance gains over time of less obvious features like compute power to make our decisions.The 12-inch MacBook is a system that ditches the Air and Pro monikers and returns to a simpler designation not seen since the classic black and white polycarbonate MacBooks of the mid-2000s (the ones you still occasionally see in coffee shops despite being their being discontinued in 2011). Especially with Apple devices where such big feature advances (like the Touch Bar) are few and far between. These benchmarks highlight that as consumers (and developers) we shouldn’t only rely on big feature advances when considering an upgrade. This makes me wonder how much more powerful the newest MacBook Pros are.? The newer 2015 MacBook Pro is dramatically more powerful. Here’s how the two computers compare: Score Typeīoth CPU scores are pretty similar but the massive difference is in the OpenCL compute power which includes the CPU, graphical processing, hardware accelerators, etc. To determine which was more performant I decided to use Geekbench to take benchmarks and compare. From the specs I assumed my personal computer would have the better performance (but that would be odd given it’s age), although my work computer does seem to handle Docker better. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |